Lens of History (5)

STEC Archives, Print Document Division
Curator signature: Cusk, on behalf of Andrea Lawrence, Chief Science Officer, STEC
Format: Archival Records
Object: Lab notebook of Andrea Lawrence, Chief Science Officer, Special Task and Evaluation Command.
Location (if known): STEC Mobile Base 03, “Avalon”
Time (if known): Feb. 10th-13th, 1989

Note: All pages have the subheading “An Assessment of Shipgirl Clothing Durability, by Dr. Andrea L. Lawrence.”

Feb 10th:

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: Beretta M9, 9x19mm NATO x5
Distance: 50 meters
Results: No effect. Bullet simply “bounced” off or fragmented upon impact.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: Beretta M9, 9x19mm NATO x5
Distance: 25 meters
Results: See above.
Comments: Wait, I have it! It’s got to be because Helena’s wearing it, right? I know what to do now…

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: Beretta M9, 9x19mm NATO x5
Distance: 5 meters
Results: See above.
Comments: Nope, let me try the other thing.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Ballistic Dummy created in crude facsimile of Helena
Equipment Used: Beretta M9, 9x19mm NATO x5
Distance: 25 meters
Results: Round fully penetrated ballistic dummy, but the cloth remain completely undamaged.
Comments: Huuuuuuuuuuh. Well, I sort of knew this would be the case, but seriously, look at that flimsy thing! Just what is the stuff made out of anyways?

Feb 11th:

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: M4 Carbine Prototype, 5.56×45mm NATO x5
Distance: 250 meters, 150m, 50m, 25m.
Results: None observed.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: Barrett Sniper Rifle Prototype, .338 Lapua Magnum x5
Distance: 250 meters
Results: Round fragmented upon contact. Otherwise no effect.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: M72LAW x5
Distance: 100 meters
Results: No visible effects.
Comments: Wow, well, time to bring out the big guns then.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: AAWS-M x 5
Distance: 1000 meters
Results: No visible effects.

Item tested: Helena’s dress and/or headpiece
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: M224 firing 10x M720A HE rounds.
Distance: 1000 meters
Results: Small crater around the otherwise unaffected Helena. Helena looking bored.
Comment: Was told that I needed to take experiments elsewhere, hmph. Well, someone should have done this stuff a LONG time ago, it’s just nobody ever took the time to do science PROPERLY!

Feb 12th:

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: M198 howitzer firing 5x M-107 standard.
Distance: 10,000 meters
Results: No visible effects.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: M1 Abrams Tank, firing 10x Prototype M829A2 APFSDS rounds
Distance: 4,000 meters
Results: No visible effects.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena
Equipment Used: M109A6 “Paladin”, firing 2x M712 Copperhead.
Distance: 8,000 meters
Results: No visible effects.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Concrete facsimile of Helena “wearing” dress.
Equipment Used: M109A6 “Paladin”, firing 2x M712 Copperhead.
Distance: 8,000 meters
Results: Facsimile reduced to fine powder. Dress unharmed.

Feb 13th:

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena, at sea.
Equipment Used: MGM-52 Lance launched from Avalon base.
Distance: ~25,000 meters
Results: No visible effects.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena, at sea.
Equipment Used: MGM-140B – Block IA launched from Avalon base.
Distance: ~25,000 meters
Results: Helena’s hair slightly out of order. Otherwise, no visible effects.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Boat with Helena’s dress placed on it.
Equipment Used: MGM-140B – Block IA launched from Avalon base.
Distance: ~25,000 meters
Results: Boat annilated. Helena’s dress completely unharmed.

Item tested: Helena’s dress
Object: Helena, at sea.
Equipment Used: BGM-109A w/W80 warhead launched from USN Destroyer – Requsition Pending DENIED
Distance: ~25,000 meters
Results: 

A note is found stapled to the crossed-out section above.

Cusk here. Mike would like to see you in his office tomorrow regarding unauthorized deployment of conventional weapons on Avalon base. Do you have any idea how much trouble you’re in? 

[Mail Call] 2017/04/02 – Sailfish edition

(Translated) “Why is Sailfish a bit of a prepper? I can see her being cautious and careful based on how you wrote her in vol. 2 but she seems really tight in terms of managing resources.”

Oh, that. This one is actually inspired quite a bit by what happened during the Squalus incident. Though even in her prototype states – as shown in the sketch below – we wanted to make her a contrast to her twin. Basically she’s a bit more humorless.

[Mail Call] 2017/04/02 - Sailfish edition

The air was getting heavy and foul. Forward, in the torpedo room, this condition already existed. Now Naquin gave the word to spread soda lime on available flat surfaces; also to bleed oxygen into the compartments from the boat’s dwindling supply. There were a few emergency rations, some crackers in the officer’s mess, but nothing more.

“We conserve everything,” Naquin said tightly. “It may be a long wait before anybody comes out, so don’t think about eating and don’t move around much.”

This is a tale from a survivor of that incident (my source comes from a dog-eared book about submarines published in the 1950s (based on the uh, advertisement in the last page) – I don’t know the title unfortunately because both the front and back cover fell off.)

This is not to say that she can’t be positive. Again, from the same source:

Few had more than shut their eyes since that first horrible moment of tragedy, for scuttlebutt had it that if a man dropped into a deep sleep, the chances were that he’d never wake up again. The air was heavy and the food had given out. Bleary-eyed, shivering sailors huddled in the near-darkness of red-glowing battle lamps, watching the overhead.

Meanwhile, in the bell-shaped chamber, along with Martin Sibitzky, were Torpedoman 1/c John Mikalowski and Gunner’s Mate 1/c Walter E. Harmon. With Sibitzky’s guidance, the bell was fitting onto the torpedo escape hatch and a signal tapped to the two sailors inside. Then the diver went up to report to an anxious Admiral Cole that the rescue chamber was now fitted to Squalus’ deck.

In the chamber, the two sweating specialists quickly brought their wrenches into play. The gasketed bottom of the compartment was now fitted to the escape trunk of the submarine and, at a signal to Falcon, a supply of air blew the bell dry. Mikalowski slithered down into the blown section, attaching toggle bars and pad-eyes on the sub’s hatch access. Now the torpedoman climbed into the chamber and tapped with his stilson wrench on the cover of the sub. Incredulous submariners heard the scraping of metal against metal – then the hatch cover bent forward!

Mikalowski shouted down into the chorus of wild shouts.

Hands reached eagerly to pump the hand of life, and then the torpedoman passed into the submarine hot coffee and smokes , after which the forward room was given a jolt of fresh air from the rescue chamber. In control, too, wildly cheering men knew the full story now. Miklowski’s work was half done. Nine of the crew in the worst condition came aboard the rescue chamber first, later nine more, and finally Naquin’s crew from the control room. 

The men were trapped inside for up to twenty-six hours. Imagine that. No light. Not much air. You can’t hear anything and you don’t know if anyone’s seen the flare or even know that you’re still here. You were tapping out morse code with a hammer for the better part of the day but now you have to stop because resources are literally running out. Everyone is more or less just trying to minimize their movements and you are just huddled together in a cold, wet, and increasingly grim darkness.

Then suddenly, help arrives. Imagine that! Just imagine that.

Remember that when we design our girls we want to basically make it so that you can believe that it’s her, so given that this was not only a majorly successful rescue (in contrast to what happened to the RN a bit later), but this was one of the few cases where a sank ship was “resurrected” and given a new opportunity. Thus, I feel like that particular event would contribute quite significantly to her personality.

See you next time. 🙂

Silent Service I: Batfish

HIYA! I’M TAUTOG! TODAY I’D LIKE TO INTRODUCE YOU TO THE FIRST SUBGIRL OF OUR BOOK. IT’S AN OLD FRIEND THAT I’M SURE YOU’VE SEEN FOR A LONG WHILE –

HAHAHA! JUST WHO WERE YOU EXPECTING? IT’S TIME TO LEARN ABOUT SUBMARINES! HOT GIRLS IN BIKINIS CAN WAIT!

Silent Service I: Batfish

LISTEN UP, MAGGOTS, AND WELCOME TO DOLPHIN’S KICKASS SUB CORNER!

IT’S LIKE TAUTOG’S SUB CORNER BUT MORE BADASS AND FILLED WITH MORE FACTS!

Silent Service I: Batfish

YOU’VE ALL SEEN THIS POSTER BEFORE. OR YOU BETTER HAVE! THIS HERE’S THE REAL DEAL, A BONA-FIDE EXAMPLE OF A REAL WORLD WAR TWO SUBMARINE RECRUITMENT POSTER!

AND YOU WANNA KNOW WHAT ELSE?

THAT THERE’S A DOLPHIN. THE OFFICIAL EMBLEM OF THE SUBMARINE SERVICE! CAPTAIN KING CAME UP WITH THAT! YES, THAT ONE. I BETCHA YOU DIDN’T KNOW ADMIRAL ERNEST KING COULD DRAW, DID YOU? WELL HE DREW AND CAME UP WITH THE BASIC DESIGN! IT’S –

Dooooolphin, your capslock key is stuck.

HUH? WHAT? Oh. 

…Whaddaya lookin’ at, depth perception? I’m not gonna distribute bikini pics for this update! It’s f[censored] April Fool’s Day, AND a FUC[censored] SATURDAY! THAT’S WORK. DO YOU KNOW WHO WORKS ON SATURDAYS?

You?

OF COURSE I DO, WHAT ELSE DO YA GOT?

Morgane?

THAT GIRL’S A WORKAHOLIC. SHE DOESN’T COUNT. 

Zero’s doing stuff too.

YEAH WELL HE’S AT A CONVENTION. THAT’S HALF WORK HALF FUN.

K9’s writing on a Saturday morning too.

WELL GOOD ON HIM –

I mean, Sima drew you like an hour ago! Just for today!

…WHERE WAS I GOING WITH THIS AGAIN?

*sigh*

That’s a wrap, folks. We’ll figure out the site and she can teach you about subgirls in our next sub corner –

KICKASS SUB CORNER!

[Mail Call] 2017/03/28 – STEC’s early days

“How does STEC keep itself operational during its early years? Wasn’t the US trying to cut down its navy?”

Yes and no. No on the cutting down its navy (in context of STEC). Here’s an example of something to keep in mind.

The budget of the US Navy in 1953 was 13 billion. STEC, in the above document, received an injection of 27 million dollars. Its actual operational cost (being a lean operation and all) was maybe about 30 million, or the cost of maybe one U-2 or half of an Essex carrier.

Putting this into perspective, STEC takes a measly 0.22% of the navy’s overall budget. This is basically chump change and is well within the estimates of Navy R&D (at the time).