More Lori

We pretty much do this and a lot more behind the scenes for every shipgirl we make. Here’s something we put into Action Report.

You can see there’s a range of details here, ranging from her normal expression (neutral face) to pretending to pay attention while listening to Bismarck-nee rant about ein Volk & ein Reich to drinking cokes (she likes sweet stuff xD) to well, getting her target results back.

Or, well, this. xD Bless Baicai for taking the time years ago to draw this. I still giggle whenever I see this one.

This is my preferred way of world building. Rather than dumping exposition as it is commonly seen in a lot of character books (e.g. favorite foods, likes, dislikes and so on), I find it much more enjoyable to set things up and revisit them later. The purpose, after all, is to create impressions of characters such that the Pacific world comes alive in your head.

For instance, with that mini up there, maybe it makes more sense for why Lori wants more ammo. People didn’t get why she isn’t paying attention to Bismarck then, since I only vaguely hinted at Lori’s background. Now, given her own experiences, maybe it makes more sense then.

(As for why she ditched the catsuit for Silent Service? Well, let’s just say, also in AR2, there’s an answer for that. It might have something to do with that shopping trip Maury took Tasha on… xD)

But, over the years, if you look at any of our characters, you’ll find a literal treasure trove of random interactions with one another. Just for Lori alone, for instance, this is what’s been revealed (across three languages, through multiple mediums, via private and personal interactions) so far.

  • She’s actually quite good (performance-wise) in training. There’s that stereotypical German efficiency after all. Sometimes her stubborn nature gets to the best of her, however, and she tend to react emotionally to personal successes or failures. She’s also rather hapless at making steady progress – Lori gets it or she doesn’t.
  • Absolutely adores Narwhal (in an obviously heterosexual, no-yuri sort of way – it’s a girl thing. Trust me). Secretly her biggest fan but is generally too afraid to approach since she thinks Narwhal must be “super duper serious.” Ironically, tend to do worse when Narwhal’s around because of nerves.
  • The actual reason is that she’s basically Tautog-tier when it comes to submarine stuff, and Narwhal and Nautilus are basically “submarine legend” types when it comes to IRL history. Plus, in the Pacific universe, every single subgirl knows some kind of *touch* and make Abyssal go explode type of “martial art.” (I swear this is actually canon and there’s actually a reason for this) Lori didn’t realize this until Narwhal showed her.
  • Narwhal actually picked out the bikini pattern for her, since she noticed that Lori really likes to imitate her.
  • Is generally a “useful idiot” by some of the more mischievous shipgirls (O’bannon, Chester, Tambor, Zao) because of her fairly naive personality. At the same time, her openness generally makes her a volunteer of sorts (and an unofficial messenger to Mike).
  • Like Ari’s hat but decides against one since “cowboy hats aren’t waterproof.”
  • Has a complicated relationship with Ulla, who went over to the USSR rather than staying behind in Germany.
  • Avoids Pennsy and Sanny like the proverbial plague. Also tend to avoid European shipgirls for reasons she’s not quite sure herself. New York intimidates her and she thinks New Jersey’s always watching her every move. (The former simply finds her to be a mild nuisance and a curiosity and the latter is, well, a literal mind-reader so that’s not entirely off)
  • Pesters Sal for unauthorized ordnance upgrades to her gear much like Tambor. Likes explosions and watching things explode.
  • Reads Marby’s writings.
  • Enjoys bothering Lulu greatly.
  • Confuses Texas and Houston and Tennsy to no end because she keep on expecting to see horses for some reason.
  • Was previously unaware that fairy Topp could talk. For about a year she kept him in Sculpin’s fishtank thinking that was his natural environment since that’s literally where he appeared from. By Silent Service (approximate a year later) she finally learned that he didn’t understand why she wanted him to hang out there either. Some times later a fairy-sized submarine was made for him.
  • Generally she’s the “along for the ride” personality in that she doesn’t mind following the lead of others. She’ll laze about and derp if she’s spending the day with Sculpin, get studious and serious if she’s with Mahan or Trout, get ditzy and happy with Cal or Hornet and so on.
  • Argues constantly with Dracha over the nature and status of German technology in WW2.

So on and so forth.

A year and a half ago I mentioned about thinking about a wiki or some sort of project to document all of these and keep them in one place. I’m still thinking about how to do this, since I want something permanent but at the same time, easy to add to. Let’s just say the wiki format wasn’t very friendly at all xD

[Mail Call] 2017/07/20 – Fairies in Pacific

Hi Morgane! I think the fairies in Pacific are neat. They aren’t very cute like the KC ones but they have their own charm to it. Are those based on real people?

In short, yes. Any fairy fully illustrated tend to be referring to historical figures. (From an out of universe perspective that’s because I want you to look these guys up!)

Recall in AR we explained that Pacific appears to have a category of “named fairies” who possess many attributes similar to, well, their historical counterparts.

In-universe, STEC doesn’t understand this at all. Nominally, fairies are notoriously difficult to communicate with. Even the shipgirls can only sort of “suggest” things to do for the fairies – they have no issues getting to do their “task” related things (like, say, loading a shell), but anything beyond this for the rank and file and it’s just like herding cats.

For instance, you’ve read about STEC carrying out R&D and stockpiling weapons for the shipgirls. You also know that at any given moment there are probably tens of thousands of fairies literally derping about and doing absolutely nothing on Avalon. Why not mobilize them and get them to, well, build stuff?

You can’t. For one thing, the vast majority of fairies doesn’t seem to really understand orders. They don’t really communicate. Specifically, they seem to have their own singsongy kind of language that (some) shipgirls claim to understand. They are definitely aware of humans and knows the human language, but how much do they listen or pay attention varies extremely considerably.

For instance, let’s say you have a bunch of AO fairies lounging around.

CV Girl: “Guys, it’s training time!”
Fairies: <o/ (very eager and ready to get working)
Mike: “Guys, it’s training time!”
Fairies: zZzzZzz…. (Basically puts it off until they have to do it.)

Or something like this:

Shipgirl: “Time to eat!”
Fairies: “YAAAAAAAAAY!” (is happy)
Shipgirl: “Time to do the dishes!”
Fairies: ??????? (literally rolls around and want to skip out on work)

Certain charismatic individuals can charm some fairies into doing extra work, but as someone in STEC put it, if fairies are meant to also represent humanity in some form, then the astounding laziness that these guys exhibit is pretty a strong piece of evidence.

I mean, you can’t really bug them either. If you nag them too much they’ll just fade “out” of existence and go dark for a while until you stop bugging them.

The exception here are the named fairies. STEC has several theories. They range from “these fairies are actually these people just empowered by God/supernatural force/whatever and turned into fairies” to “these fairies are just fairies who grew sufficiently powerful and managed to take upon a particular identity” to “these fairies aren’t fairies at all but are a totally different category of beings like shipgirls.”

STEC really doesn’t know. What STEC does know, however, is that these fairies are as intelligent (if not more so) than their real life counterparts. What’s more, they can be communicated with. Which means they can be reasoned with and given tasks to assist with the anti-Abyssal effort.

…Except that’s the thing. STEC’s not entirely sure if these fairies are “fairy-enough.” Specifically, these guys behave, well, entirely like real people. Yes, they have access to the full array of fairy powers ranging from invisibility to teleportation to “conjuring” physical illusions. They are more powerful than the non-speaking “ordinary” fairies. They appear to be unique in the sense that multiple copies of the “same person” hasn’t showed up yet.

But their behaviors are entirely human. Or, rather, their behaviors are very different from the ordinary fairies. Personality-wise, the individuals that know them describe these individuals as what they “would” or could be. They seek out entertainment and get bored just like normal people. They have hobbies and dreams and wishes and get fascinated by technology. In short, they lack the single-minded, almost autistic type behavior of the –

Actually you know what. I take what I said up there back. A lot of these guys are so absorbed in their work that they really aren’t too different from the fairies themselves.

I mean, for instance, that guy? Good luck getting him away from his papers.

Oh yeah? Well, excuse me. I’m just trying to get humanity to Mars!”

[Historical Inspirations] 2017/07/19 – More Midway shenanigans

This should probably be titled “Morgane argues with anons on the internet over history” –

Nah, I’m not really arguing. I am vigorously disagreeing. Also this is about the first time I’ve gotten comments on the IRL history as opposed to Pacific history/lore, so this takes precedent over some of the other comments (just look at how many things I’ve left unanswered from the forums or the channel or email…)

hello. regarding your post on the 19th 2017. you mentioned that the american pilots who flew at midway were greenhorns. while this is a general assumption i can assure you that with some digging this is the complete opposite case.

1: wildcats are in extreme short supply. and escorts were called off in an effort to increase the power of the bombing runs

2: thach’s wildcat flight engaged the zero swarm at a position of energy deficiency. aka, below.

3: 21 F2As were used on midway

it might be noted that of course. all 21 buffalos were smashed (well what did you expect they are like biplanes but worse), thach’s 6 cat flight slaughtered the zeroes with most members never getting the ‘thach weave’ briefing, and all ijn carriers went up in flames. if anything, i would say that the american crew at midway was just about equally skilled as their japanese counterpart. the japanese pilots however, probably didn’t expect wildcats to actually outmatch their zeroes.

I don’t think I can agree with that.

Commissioned officers they might be, but in the winter of 1941, these young brown-shoe officers, and their sometimes even younger backseat gunners and radiomen, for all their daredevil courage and enthusiasm, had nowhere near the length of service, the physical and mental training, or the combat experience of their Japanese counterparts. Nevertheless, in January of 1942, the three American carrier groups, with their embarked aircraft flown by young and untested pilots, were the only offensive weapons Nimitz had to hand, and he planned to use them aggressively. The Kidō Butai was supreme in the Pacific Ocean, but there were other targets of opportunity available to the American brown shoes.

Craig Symond, the Battle of Midway. Considered by many naval enthusiasts to be the best Midway book to come out to date.

I bring up this perspective because it is important to note that both the US and Japan were learning, which pre-empts a common and wrong impression that somehow six months into the Pacific war the US were suddenly Japan’s equal. As much as the US CVs racked up “experience” at Coral Sea, the Japanese CVs were also gaining experience considering that the Kidou Butai has been rampaging throughout the Pacific all the way up to that point as well.

In fact, US CV tactics did not mature prior to Towers/Sherman’s massive falling out. What made US CVs deadly was the doctrine involving the fast carrier task force, and that didn’t come about until 1943.

Other points to consider if you’ve done your digging.

  • Yorktown’s flight group was a patchwork of pilots. Max Leslie’s VB-3 were reinforced from Saratoga, many of whom basically sat around after the Saratoga were torpedoed. Thach’s VF-3 had most of their veteran pilots sent to shore. His replacements includes that from the Ranger and other assorted pilots. Some hadn’t seen a carrier for months. Others haven’t served on one period. What’s more, VF-3’s veteran exec officer was killed a few days before Midway in an accident. Contrast this to the IJN air groups that has been training and fighting with each other since the beginning of the war. The advantage here, loathe as I am to admit it, still go slightly over to the IJN.
  • Hornet’s pilots were completely green. Midway was their first combat. Even neglecting everything else 1/3rd of the US carrier airgroups are complete newbies. This experience is self-evident given the Hornet’s performance at Midway.
  • Enterprise’s flight groups were veteran in that they had experience; this is still 1 on 4. Also, unlike the Yorktown planes, the Enterprise’s attack was less coordinated comparatively. Gray went home without engaging the Japanese, leaving Lindsay to fend for himself.
  • The USMC pilots were a mixed bag. 21 pilots reinforced Midway on May 26th. 17 of those were fresh out of flight school, many with virtually no additional experience. Examples include the after-report from VMSB-241. Take a look yourself.

Emphasis in red, mine.

  • The TBFs from what was supposed to be Hornet’s Torpedo 8 were also green. Haven’t seen combat at all.
  • The 4 Army B-26s couldn’t even find the right course and had to be assisted by a friendly PBY to get to Midway.

You must have a very low opinion of the IJN to think that our guys up there were “just about equally skilled.”


1: wildcats are in extreme short supply. and escorts were called off in an effort to increase the power of the bombing runs

Source? Because I have Fletcher’s logs in front of me right now. He has 18 Wildcats in total on Yorktown. He’s keeping 6 for CAP and 6 for VS-5, which wasn’t launched in that first attack wave. That leaves 6 to go with Thach. Don’t think he called off any escorts there.

2: thach’s wildcat flight engaged the zero swarm at a position of energy deficiency. aka, below.

3: 21 F2As were used on midway

it might be noted that of course. all 21 buffalos were smashed (well what did you expect they are like biplanes but worse), thach’s 6 cat flight slaughtered the zeroes with most members never getting the ‘thach weave’ briefing, and all ijn carriers went up in flames.

You have a weird definition of slaughter. For one thing, our torpedo bombers got slaughtered.

From Thach himself:

“six F4F-4 airplanes cannot prevent 20 or 30 Japanese VF from shooting down our slow torpedo planes.”

Secondly, for our own fighter performance? From Buckmaster, Captain of Yorktown:

“When about 4 miles from the Jap outer screen., which in turn was about 10- miles out from the CV’s, two AA bursts were fired by a Jap ship. These bursts were used evidently to direct the enemy Combat Air Patrol to our planes, for almost immediately afterwards our VT and VF were attacked by about 18-20 Zero fighters. Our VF formed a line astern formation in order to stay together and give the leader an opportunity to turn and fire at the attacking planes. Soon after this the rear fighter was shot down. The formation twisted and turned to prevent the Zeros from getting on their tails and also to obtain firing position. During the engagement our remaining 3 VF were able to shoot down 5 Zeros. The Zeros concentrated most of their attacks on the rear plane, making beam and astern runs and pulling clear after each run.

The two VF planes directly over the torpedo planes were able to furnish considerable support to the VT during the first part of the approach when there were only 4 Zeros attacking. But later they were joined by 6 more Zeros, and the 2 VF were too heavily out-numbered to be of much help. They shot down one Zero and possibly another, and saw one Zero shot down by the TBD rear seat men. Soon thereafter, they became separated from each other and from the torpedo planes. One of these fighters was badly damaged and crash landed on board the Hornet. The 4 remaining planes of the escort group landed on board. They lost one pilot and two planes and shot down 6 and damaged two Zeros in the engagement.”

So let’s break this down using American numbers.

2 VF scored one kill. They were outnumbered so this is par for the course. Thach & friends, 3 planes in all, were able to kill 5 Zeros despite being massively outnumbered. This is impressive, but it’s not anything close to a “slaughter.” You are right to say that the Japanese got a rude awakening. This seems to be the case based on what sources we can access from the Japanese.

However, Thach himself scored 3 out of the 5 kills. So I’d say this is really a case of Thach himself being quite good and the Japanese underestimating their opponents. I’m fairly certain if you cloned four of him and put him in this fight then yes, it might have been something of a slaughter, but as it was it was a good hit on the nose.

Also, on the Buffalo?

The Finns had a 26:1 kill ratio flying those Buffalos. Not saying that they were great airframes, but if you knew how to make ’em work, you can. 😉

if anything, i would say that the american crew at midway was just about equally skilled as their japanese counterpart. the japanese pilots however, probably didn’t expect wildcats to actually outmatch their zeroes.

The Wildcat did not “outmatch” the Zero at Midway. Spruance’s action report reads as follows, which sums up the majority of the feelings on the Wildcat for this battle.

“(k) The performance of our F4F-4 is reported as greatly inferior to the Jap “Zero” fighter. The ammunition supply for 6 guns of our VFs in inadequate. For use against the unprotected “Zero,” 4 machine guns instead of six in our F4F-4’s, with the weight saved used for additional ammunition, merits consideration. A new VF with greater range and maneuverability is required.”

By the way, the Wildcat actually didn’t do too poorly. Postwar assessment showed that it would fight the Zero to more or less parity as we figured out very quickly how to actually fight a Zero. It still managed a 5+ kill ratio in 1942.


Anyways. At the end of the day, vigorous disagreements are what makes things fun. I mean, I do this so that people (myself included) can learn. So I hope you find my opinion – if not my answers – satisfactory. Thanks for dropping by.

Silent Service: Torpedo basics

…Do I have my subcorner back now?

No Dolphin randomly barging in, n-no random shipgirls asking me to explain other stuff?

Yay.

Subcorner.

Okay. Today’s sub corner is actually just something super technical. I’ve been um, doing this thing you call lurking. I have to say, a lot of people are seriously underestimating how hard it is to hit a target with a torpedo!

Just imagine. You are in the conning tower of a World War II American submarine. You’re probably standing near the attack periscope, having seen a target from your submarine. You’re gonna have to shoot well, because if they find you you might not get a chance to come home. The torpedo isn’t a smart weapon (though we’re working on that!) and once it leaves the tube, it’s done. The torpedo has to gain the right speed, depth, and course all at the same time to get a hit.

But the sleek torpedoes we find in the war were nothing like what they started out with. At the beginning, during the very early days, torpedoes were connected by wires, and they were controlled by men standing on the shore. They would control the torpedo by interacting with its rudders directly, and the torpedo’s power would be sometimes supplied by dynamos on shore.

In fact, we call the torpedo “fish” because that’s what it was. A torpedo that could swim on its own. And we’ll start by talking about the Mark 3 Bliss-Leavitt torpedo, widely seen as the first torpedo in the US navy.

Created in 1903, this basically had all the things we’d recognize as a torpedo. It could swim on its own, can control its own depth, and went pretty fast. It could go 1200 yards at about 35 knots. Don’t laugh. It was pretty impressive for something we had really no clue to make. So the navy took a closer look and though, let’s make one for submarines.

Enter the Mark 4. This one can go 2000 yards at 29 knots, and it was the first torpedo to be developed exclusively for submarines. The torpedo itself wasn’t the most impressive thing, though. Rather, with a functional torpedo in hand, the US navy set out to make something that could help the submarine captain in his task.

(This figure is taken from a book called Submarine Torpedo Tactics. Surprise, surprise, right?)

Okay, see that? That’s basically what a submarine have to deal with. To hit anything you have to know how fast the other ship is going, what angle you’re shooting your torpedo from, how deep your torpedo is traveling at so you can set the proper attack angle. You have to know how far your torpedo can go before it runs out of steam, but at the end of the day? This is a simple right triangle.

From the submarine, where I can see the ship, that’s the hypotenuse. The target’s course – where it is going – is one leg, and because (or I hope) my torpedo goes in a straight line, it forms the other leg of this triangle. Thus, all I have to do to figure things out is to do a bunch of calculations very quickly using simple trigonometry.

Of course, a ship is not going to just sail merrily along. It would also be very time consuming to do all the math by hand. So, even before WW1, we were thinking about automating the calculating process. These machines tend to be pretty simple, and they would automatically calculate an aiming point for you. I’m having trouble finding you pictures of one, but just imagine a metal object with a bunch of slides and rulers on it. It looks a lot like the DD one here.

Basically we’re talking about literally the infancy of torpedo tactics here. In a submarine this thing would be tied to the periscope. The sliding arms would go under and forward of the periscope and the officer would be adjusting the arms as the captain yelled out the target’s bearing or angle or speed or range estimates. This is before the TDC and before anything fancy, but it was enough to get the job done – or so we thought.

But, you know, once we’ve started on something, someone’s always going to ask: how can we do it better? So I thought I’d show you what the old stuff looks like before we get onto more modern things.