[Historical Inspirations] 2017/06/18 – the Marianas Turkey Shoot (Midway in Reverse)

We’re a day early (well, not so much over in Asia), but today I thought I’d like to touch on the Battle of the Philippines Sea that took place tomorrow and the day after, seventy-three years ago.

Colloquially known as the “Marianas Turkey Shoot,” this, more so than Midway, was what dealt the IJN a killing blow. On the first day, the USN destroyed no less than 358 Japanese planes (in a post-war account in 1945 – you’ll find numbers varying here and there due to reporting discrepancies) at a loss of 33. Taking into account the second day’s events, Japan would lose three carriers and more than 600 carrier and land-based aircraft.

The damage done to the IJN was irrecoverable. In two days Japan had lost its fleet air elements, depleted its pilots and reserve aircraft, and lost capitals ships that it could not afford to lose. While Japanese media downplayed the impact, the evidence speaks for itself when four months later, the once capable carrier task force was sent out as bait during the Leyte Gulf operation.

What went wrong?

Well, for starters, I did ask Sune – citizen of Japan, (literal) daughter of samurais, and our residential IJN expert. She had this to say.

OZAWA DID NOTHING WRONG

While tongue in cheek, Sune’s assessment of the IJN boiled down to the following perspectives. It was a bit like a reverse-Midway in that this time, the IJN had several advantages that the US enjoyed. It had access to land-based aircraft. Land-bases means that the Japanese planes can strike, land at a Japanese base, refuel and rearm, and go in for another strike. The carrier force, while diminished, was in capable hands given Jisaburo Ozawa’s command. The winds were in favor of the Japanese.

Like Midway, this was a battle the IJN had to win. The Truk and Marianas “line” was Japan’s final line of defense. The reason why we went after Saipan was that through Saipan, we can launch strategic bombers at the Japanese home islands. Taking the Marianas area renders the entire Japanese force vulnerable, and the IJN was well aware of this. Not to mention, the recent string of losses were some of the first losses of territory that were previously in Japanese hands.

At the time of the Battle of the Philippines Sea, Saipan has been in American hands for only a few days. We were every bit aware that the Japanese wanted it back, and given the strong endurance of the lighter IJN (and IJA) planes, a battle was expected. Again, similarly to Yamamoto’s original thinking, Nimitz also sent a message to the fleet on the eve of battle. It read:

The officers and men of the Fleet have the confidence of the naval service and their country on the eve of a possible major surface engagement with the enemy. We count on you for a decisive victory.

In a very curious parallel to Midway, we need to remember: Admiral Mitscher was supposed to be bombing Guam. Much like how Nagumo was ordered to both destroy Midway’s garrison and the US surface fleet, Spruance was meant to reinforce and protect the Marianas invasion fleet. To that end, he was to take the opportunity to hit Japanese airfields on positions such as Guam if he could.

(I didn’t find any evidence of Nimitz telling him to attack the islands. However, Spruance is not a passive commander – so it’s entirely plausible that he’d take advantage of the opportunity if it comes up)

The Japanese, on the other hand, saw the destruction of the US carrier force as their primary goal. Here again would be an excellent parallel – just as Nimitz ordered Spruance to inflict as much attrition damage as possible, here, too, did the GHQ order Ozawa to destroy decisively the Fast Carrier Task Force.

Indeed. Spruance and Mitscher did order strikes against Guam on the morning of the 19th. However, here is where things went very differently.

First, we immediately recalled the island strike groups over Guam upon finding out the massive amount of Japanese plane readying up and taking off. Both Spruance and Mitscher were at Midway. They know exactly what happens to carriers if an enemy attack can catch them unprepared. The important thing was to get fighters in the air to interdict enemy planes.

Failing to do so would make the respotting (aircraft has to be “spotted” forward on the flight decks so the after portions of the flight deck can be free to recover incoming planes) highly dangerous since the planes on the decks themselves can be damaged and destroyed (to say nothing of the carriers themselves).

What’s more, as the fighters took off, the torpedo bombers and dive bombers were sent off in the opposite direction – just in case something was to slip through. This minimized the dangers of catastrophic explosions – the likes of which that took out the Akagi during Midway.

Like Midway, Ozawa threw group after group of aircraft at the US fleet. Totaling nine waves in all, some of which involved large groups of forty to fifty planes. On the US side? All the US carriers did was to cycle through and refuel/rearm the fighters. Terse excitement was in the air as the US forces realized upon seeing the waves and waves of attacks that this was the big one – this was it!

From about 10 to 3 the IJN attacked all day. They didn’t hit a single US carrier, and the only ship damaged was a battleship (the South Dakota). US submarines found and hit the Shokaku and Taihou, and by evening the US launched 240 planes to hit the rest of the Japanese fleet. Hiyou was sank nearly instantly, and the remaining carriers – Zuikaku, Junyou, and Chiyoda – were damaged.

That night, Admiral Toyoda ordered Ozawa to retreat. The Battle of the Philippines Sea was over. The US lost far more planes (80 in all) as a result of ditching in the water on that last attack wave than the Japanese shot down.

What happened? In no particular order…

The Hellcat happened, for one. The US had better planes this time around. The Wildcat could give the Zero a good fight (and I would actually argue that it’s better than what most people give her credit for).

Two. The US were not the inexperienced green recruits of the Hornet flying at Midway. These were veteran pilots – some with thousands of hours of flight experience and confirmed kills – flying a plane that outclassed the Zero. The Japanese had some veterans from Midway (and indeed, many would continue to survive) but the bulk of their trained pilots were shot down in this battle. Here, they were the inexperienced ones in comparison.

Three. Radar happened. The USN saw the IJN come from hundreds of miles away. Like Midway, this prompted the US carrier commanders to act.

Four. The US had better battle doctrines. Whether it’s target prioritization or layering AA fire with the escorting fleet elements or intercepting enemy air, the US held a tactical advantage over the IJN in this battle.

At this point, it might be tempted to ask. The USN was able to overcome many IJN advantages at Midway and score a miraculous victory. Was there any way for the IJN to have done the same – taking out one or more of the US fast carriers to make this battle more even?

The answer is yes. Anything is possible. However, and this brings my piece to an end here – I think it would be extremely unlikely. Leadership and discipline is the final advantage that the US had, and this advantage was paramount. The US was blessed by the twin benefits of having good officers on the field – individuals such as Mac McCampbell of the Air Group 15 – and steady fleet commanders such as Spruance.

These guys knew what they were doing and were focused on their task. The fact that the US CAP didn’t run off to chase after IJN torpedo bombers and the IJN dealing virtually no damage to the US carriers is proof of that.

For something like Midway to happen, you need luck, of course, but you also need to capitalize on any temporary advantages as well as punishing the enemy for their mistakes. The USN at Midway had all three. The IJN at the Battle of the Philippines Sea had little of the first, unsure of the second, and definitely had little to exploit when it comes to US mistakes.

In fact. I think it’s impressive that something like 130 IJN carrier planes managed to make it home out of the near-400 that sortied. The losses of the carriers (and many of these planes) after? Well, that’s incompetence, plain and simple, but one could hardly fault the pilots for that.

See you next time – and, cheer up, Zuizu. You’re still my favorite Japanese CV girl. 🙂

Silent Service XII: The SBD Dive Bomber(!?)

Huh. Tautog’s not here. Didn’t she have to give a sub corner today?

…Looks like she left her clipboard.

Let’s see…

“Argh! Panic! K9 is a lazy bum and hasn’t given me a topic today…”

Well that’s not good…

What’s this button do –

Oooooh. I get it. This must be the magic update button. Hah! Yeah! Okay. I got this.

Hi Everyone! Welcome to Enterprise’s carrier corner! Since Morgane and Sune have been talking about Midway recently, I thought it would be nice to talk a bit about the Douglas SBD “Dauntless” dive bomber. It won us the battle after all!

The SBD was developed from the Northrop BT-1, a previous dive bomber design. The BT-1 didn’t fly very well – especially at low speeds, important for a carrier aircraft – but Northrop didn’t quite have the money to fix it. At the time, Northrop was a subsidiary of Douglas Aircraft, so Douglas Aircraft took over the job of fixing it.

The Northrop BT-1 – Kinda funny looking, but you can clearly see how this would turn into the SBD we know and love! One of the issues of the BT-1 was that the tail would buffet hard when the dive brakes were deployed. They fixed this by adding in those distinctive holes in the dive brakes that you see on the SBDs.

Douglas would heavily modify the BT-1 into a new design called the SBD-1. The new design proved to be a massive improvement in performance over the previous BT-1, and it was soon put into production. Unfortunately, the SBD-1 wasn’t very good either. It didn’t go very far, and with only two .30 caliber machine guns in the front and a single .30 cal in the back, its defensive armament was lackluster. Even worse was the fact that it didn’t have any armor or self sealing fuel tanks! Only 57 of them were ever built, and since the Navy didn’t want them, they were given to the Marines instead.

An upgrade soon came in the form of the SBD-2. This upgraded design would feature additional fuel tanks and armor plating. The two .30 cals in the front were replaced with two hard hitting .50 cals. While helpful, this did nothing to fix the slow speed of the plane. Pilots would end up calling it the “Clunk”, “Barge”, or as an ironic reading of SBD, the “Speedy.”

With the last delivery scheduled for January of 1942, the poor SBDs were declared obsolete at first. But, the Pearl Harbor attack would change all of that. The Navy ended up calling up the SBD-2 because well, an obsolete dive bomber is better than no dive bomber. So, off they went to war.

The SBD-2, to many’s surprise, prove itself capable in the Battle of Coral Sea, sinking the carrier Shohou and seriously damaging the carrier Shoukaku. Some even managed air to air kills!

 

SBD-2s flying over the USS Enterprise – it’s me! Or, ya know, the other me!

All this time, the Navy was working hard to make the SBD combat ready. Soon one was made. SBD-3. This version gets a more powerful engine, self sealing fuel tanks (if the enemy hits your fuel tank it won’t leak! Handy for getting home), and a twin .30 cal defensive gun mount in the back. This version would prove itself in battle soon enough – it’s what brought us the great victory at Midway.

Rugged and reliable, the SBD was a pleasure to fly. The pilots affectionately gave it a nickname. The “Slow But Deadly”. It’s the nickname that would stick to the SBD to the end of the war.

Crew loading a bomb onto a SBD. That metal cradle it’s sitting in would swing outwards, allowing the bomb to clear the propeller.

The SBD still received upgrades as the war went on. Later versions focused on improving the powerplant, but it was eventually phased out for the Curtiss SB2C. Some of you know that plane as the Helldiver. Now, while the Helldiver was an improvement over the SBD, it had some developmental issues to work out and appeared much later than the Navy had planned. The plane was hard to service, the crews didn’t like it much due to its poor handling, and its engine was also underpowered. The “Son of a Bitch, 2nd Class” just didn’t have the charm the “Slow but Deadly” had.

Hey, it was hard letting the SBD go. In the first year of the war alone, the SBD sank nearly 30% of the Japanese war fleet in total tonnage. This dive bomber, written off as obsolete, ended the war with a 3.2:1 air-to-air kill ratio. That’s higher than some fighters.

Not bad, huh? I love the SBD. It’s a lot like America during the war itself. We get written off as goofballs often enough, but we’ve always been the underdog. We didn’t always have this massive advantage in technology like we do now, but even then? The boys made do with what they have, and that’s –

Hi Prisse. I found K9. I also gave him a very stern talking to. He and Sune’s slacking off again!

Oh? Um. Hi! It’s summer. Good time to relax –

No Relaxing! Book’s out in a month. If he has time to grind out a Bismarck in World of Minsk Shipbuilder & Design he has time to get back to work.

Minsk Shipbuilder – Oh! You mean World of Waterboats.

Warships. 

Yeah. That! What do you think –

Slow gameplay. Terrible grind. Horrible choice of premiums. Ship designs entirely powered by Stalinium and wishful thinking. Community of players make you rapidly lose faith in humanity. Worst of all, NO SUBMARINES. 

… What kind of a naval battle game doesn’t have submarines?!

But you still play.

…Yeah. Thanks for the piece today, Prisse. Really appreciate it. The Missouri’s not going to pop into my account by magic you know!

See ya next time. 🙂

Silent Service XI: U.S. Submarine Crew Composition

“Hi there! My name is Tautog and welcome to another one of my sub corners -”

THAT’S WHAT A PANSY WOULD SAY!

YOU GOTTA MAKE YOUR STUFF KICKASS OR ELSE PEOPLE’LL FALL ASLEEP.

HELLO READER!

YOU WERE EXPECTING TAUTOG? TOO BAD, IT IS I, DOLPHIN!

ALRIGHT LISTEN UP. WELCOME TO ANOTHER EPISODE OF DOLPHIN’S KICKASS SUB CORNER! IT HAS COME TO MY ATTENTION THAT MOST OF YOU HAVE NO CLUE HOW A DAMN SUBMARINE WORKED TO BEGIN WITH!

SO I’M GONNA TALK ABOUT A BIT OF THAT TODAY. JUST REMEMBER. THE ONE TAKEAWAY MESSAGE TODAY IS THAT THE SUBMARINE’S CREW IS A CREW OF THINKING MEN!

…You’d be a lot more effective if you weren’t shouting all the time.

SHUT UP DEPTH PERCEPTION I’M TALKING HERE. MY ORDERS ARE FROM MORGANE’S MOUTH TO MY EARS, SON! SO I’M DOING THE SUB CORNER TODAY.

Yes but she didn’t tell you to just shout…

SHOUTING IS HIGH ENERGY! IT’S BEEN SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN TO IMPROVE MORALE. DO YOU NOT WANT IMPROVED MORALE?

THAT’S WHAT I THOUGHT.

OKAY. BACK TO WHAT I WAS SAYING. THERE’S THIS STEREOTYPE THAT MILITARY MEN ARE A BUNCH OF BLOCKHEAD IDIOTS IN WORLD WAR 2. THAT MIGHT BE TRUE FOR SOME BRANCHES CONSIDERING THAT THE AVERAGE EDUMACATION LEVEL WASN’T TOO HIGH, BUT NOT FOR THE SUBMARINES!

THE SUBMARINE SERVICE VALUED BRAINS OVER BRAWN, AND EVERYONE ON BOARD’S A SPECIALIST. IT’S WHY THE AVERAGE NON-RATED MEN ARE LESS THAN 20% OF THE ENTIRE CREW. THE SUBMARINE’S HARD TO WORK WITH, SO EACH OFFICER AND MAN MUST BE A SPECIALIST IN HIS OWN JOB, BUT HE MUST KNOW HIS SHIPMATE’S JOB AS WELL.

…OKAY. NOW THAT YOU MENTION IT. WOW. ALL CAPS WRITING IS KINDA HARD TO READ…

*mumbles*

Okay. Fine. Maybe Tautog’s got a point.

Anyways. It’s obvious why they do it. Submarines operate in very tough environments. If anything goes wrong each man must be able to step up and do the job.

Hence, before an officer or man can get qualification on a WW2-era submarine, he must first test a very tough written AND oral test on everything that’s on a submarine. That means the man must know all the machinery, piping, equipment, and everything else that goes into the submarine. This is a case where every man knows how to fire the torpedo tubes or change the batteries or maintain the engine. Wouldn’t be surprised if they knew how the TDC worked either.

The reds like to say that they’re a perfect machine made of men. Well, the US sub crew’s even better! There are no spare parts here. Every man is a cog in the wheel, and each cog must do its job to perfection IF the submarine is to function smoothly, efficiently, and above all else, SAFELY. See, the US is very good at that as well. We value the men and we’ll probably talk about it in another sub corner at some point.

K9 sometimes say if we take all the girls from Pacific we can operate a sub on our own. He’s not wrong. The US submarine started off the war with 5 officers and 54 enlisted men. Later on in the war this number grew to around 8 officers and 75 men.

The senior officer of the submarine – captain – is typically called the “Old Man.” This is because he was much older than the crew. At the outbreak of WW2 he was probably a Lt. commander who was 34-36. The executive officer of the submarine acted as navigator. Apart from these two there’s no seniority on a submarine, and the sub assigns the following roles based on experience and their capabilities.

So, you’ve got the chief engineer. The torpedo and gunnery officer. The comms officer. The Commissary officer. Sometimes they’ve got radio officer. I shouldn’t need to explain what each one of these guys do. The names are pretty OBVIOUS. After all.

Then you’ve got the men. About half I’d say are motor machinist’s mates, electrician’s mates, and torpedoman’s mates. The first of these three works in the engine room primarily and operates machine tools. The electrician’s mate works with batteries and all sorts of electronics.

The last guy… Do I really need to explain what a torpedoman does?

Then you’ve got radiomen and other operators that work the electronics. There are three quartermasters or signalmen, one gunner’s mate, two cooks, two steward’s mates, one pharmacists’ mate, one yeoman, and some ordinary fireman and seaman to round things off.

Oh. The senior petty officer on board (usually a chief torpedoman’s mate) is designated the chief of the boat.

… WHICH MEANS IF WE GO CREW A SUBMARINE. GUESS WHO THAT’S GONNA BE?

HAH. SEE YA NEXT TIME.

[Historical Inspirations] 2017/06/05 – The Battle of Midway

Sune’s earlier comment on the bigger picture is a good note to lead into today’s piece, which will be concluding our three-parter on the Battle of Midway.

I want to make two major notes here in today’s piece. One is that I think we had the advantage in orders. Two is that – as you’ll see in a bit – it was a hard-won victory.

To begin, I think America’s advantage in the Battle of Midway, all else considered, was a stroke of good fortune in the form of having the right commanding officers.

While Sune was largely right to criticize Yamamoto (he is, after all, the commanding officer), I think I’d like to say that Yamamoto had the right general idea. Famous for wanting to end the war quickly, he needed that decisive battle, he needed to lure out the US carriers, and he needed to do it without doing it close to Hawaii.

From the Japanese perspective, GHQ was absolutely glowing with cheer. Even Hitler sent a congratulations to Tokyo, stating that “After this new defeat, the US warships will hardly dare to face the Japanese fleet again. Any US warship which accepts action against the Japanese naval forces is as good as lost!”

Why did no one speak up against Yamamoto’s overly complex plan? I think it’s safe to say, nobody wanted to. To the Japanese, victory felt like it was near. Taking into context of the times, the Japanese assumed that we were nearly beaten and ready to surrender. With that assumption, then, their planning makes sense. Their mistake was not accurately assessing whether or not said assumption was correct. Let me share a funny little story aboard the Yamato that illustrates this point.

In the celebration of the Coral Sea battle, the cook messed up the fish. Heijiro Omi, steward of Yamamoto, saw that the tai, a fish that was cooked from head to tail, was broiled in miso rather than salt. There’s an expression in Japanese – to put miso on something – is a metaphor for making a mess. This was an ill portent, but Yamamoto himself ignored this. He instead proceeded to get drunk with the other officers.

An anecdote, but I think it illustrates the point well. Japan got a little careless. Yamamoto should have considered the portents more – especially about what would happen if the Americans did not play according to plan.

Simply put, Yamamoto made a number of key assumptions that he did not really follow through to confirm, nor did he communicate well what was to be expected if an encounter was to occur. Had he kept it simple – destroy the US airgroup at Midway, clear the way for the invasion force – or, alternatively, – destroy the US fleet – the execution would have been much simpler.

As it stands? Nobody had any idea what Nagumo was supposed to do when the US carriers showed up. This part was never made clear to anyone, and I think Nagumo did his best to follow his orders through. When he had no confirmation that the US carriers were near, he simply bombed Midway as ordered. After he found the US carriers, he attacked the carriers – as ordered.

Contrast this with Nimitz, who had a much simpler plan in mind. Meet the Japanese at Midway and inflict heavy damage. The navy codebreakers gave him an important edge here as he knew that the Japanese were after Midway. He put the right number of pickets – submarines, flying boats, and scout aircraft – in his Midway task force, and he gave Fletcher and Spruance very simple orders.

“Inflict as much damage as possible by using strong attrition tactics. Apply the principle of calculated risk which means avoiding exposing your forces to attack by the superior enemy forces without good prospect of inflicting greater damage to the enemy.”

It goes without saying that this was far easier to adhere to than Nagumo’s orders. Yet even so, the Japanese held most of the tactical advantage. The four carriers of the Kidou butai has more advanced aircraft, more aircraft (if we purely count the CV aircraft), better fighters, better torpedo bombers, and I would contend (based on combat experience and hours of flight) more experienced air crew overall.

Where we had the edge, if you’re to believe this America, was morale.

The Japanese strike force’s morale was high. I would say they were impetuous, and we have plenty of evidence for this ranging from records of non-fighters impromptuly dropping ordnance to dogfight the slow USN fighters to the massive lemming train (apologies, but that’s basically accurate in describing the CAP above the Japanese CVs when we hit) trying to gun down more planes for personal glory. In their eagerness to cement this victory, they opened themselves up to attack.

On the US side? Morale was high. I’ve gone through countless anecdotes and recollections, and the entire fleet wanted to slap-the-Japs and give them a solid thrashing. Everyone knew the odds. They knew that the enemy had more carriers and more planes. Admiral Fletcher just told them that.

Yet there was no fear. Just excitement. Nobody know how, but the information spread like wildfire. At long last here was a chance to fight back. In the words of the leader of Torpedo 8 – the squadron from Hornet that didn’t come home: “If there is only one plane left to make a final run in, I want that man to go in and get a hit.”

Just a word to let you know I feel we are all ready. We have had a very short time to train, and we have worked under the most severe difficulties. But we have truly done the best humanly possible. I actually believe that under these conditions we are the best in the world. My greatest hope is that we encounter a favorable tactical situation, but if we don’t and worst comes to worst, I want each of us to do his utmost to destroy our enemies. If there is only one plane left to make the final run-in, I want that man to go in and get a hit. May God be with us all. Good luck, happy landings, and give ‘em hell.

“We will go in, we don’t turn back. We will attack. Good luck!”

They knew that the planes were obsolete and that the equipment was poor, but they went in anyways. They were given orders and they were determined to follow through. Such was the mind of everyone involved in the Midway attack force. This is the definition of heroism.

As it stands? The lone survivor, George “Tex” Gay, watched his squadron leader, then the rest of his squad go down. Then his plane was shot down as well. All 15 TBDs of Torpedo 8 were shot down. Despite fighting to the last man, no one scored a hit.

What Torpedo 8 went through was no different than every other US air group that tried to do their duty. Let’s run down the list.

Wave One:
6 TBF Avenger Torpedo Bombers from Midway. 1 survived. No hits.
4 Army Marauders from Midway. 2 survived. No hits.

Wave Two:
15 B-17 Flying Fortresses attack. No hits.

Wave Three:
16 USMC Dauntlesses from Midway. 8 survived. No hits.

Wave Four:
12 USMC SB2U Vindicators from Midway. 7 survived. No hits.

Wave Five:
15 TBDs (VT-8) from Hornet. 0 survived. No hits.

10 Wildcats (VF-8) from Hornet. Could not find target & ran out of fuel. 0 survived. No hits.

16 SBDs (VB-8) from Hornet. Could not find target. 13 survived (3 were lost due to fuel). No hits.

16 SBD (VS-8) from Hornet. Could not find target. All returned to carrier with bomb still attached. No hits.

Wave Six:
15 TBDs (VT-6) from Enterprise. 5 survived. No hits.

10 Wildcats (VF-6) from Enterprise. Circled above Kidou Butai waiting for signal from VT-6 or other air groups. No signal was received. 10 survived to return to Enterprise. No hits.

Wave Seven:

12 TBDs (VT-3) from Yorktown. 0 survived. No hits.

6 Wildcats (VF-3) from Yorktown. 5 (4) survived.  No hits.

… let’s hold on for a second and look at this. By the numbers, how were we doing?

“Terrible” is putting it nicely, don’t you think?

I bring the numbers up to emphasize that Midway was a hard-earned victory. Different historians have different perspectives on just how much each individual airgroup’s sacrifice contributed to the victory at large. Certainly they drew off the fires from the Zeros and forced the Zeros to go off position. They definitely kept Nagumo off balance and delayed any launches of attack groups. Yes, at the end of the day, they ate up bullets and cannon shells from the opposing Zeros.

But honestly ask yourself. Does this – total losses of multiple squadrons – look like winning to you?

Even the SBDs that showed up immediately after took heavy losses. VS-6 came with 18 SBDs and left with 10. VB-6 showed up with 15 and left with 7. Yorktown’s VB-3 fared better, only losing 2 out of 17, but Max Leslie showed up with a quarter of his bombs missing. VS-5, the other Yorktown bomber group, was held back in reserve.

Fateful Five Minutes, indeed.

As it stands, the entire SBD force dogpiled Kaga. What made the difference in this first round was that VB-6’s Best took initiative to split off and go for Akagi instead, and a single lucky hit was scored that took her down for good. Meanwhile, Leslie’s group ripped apart Soryu, and the rest, as we say, became history.

Ask yourself what would have happened if the Yorktown and Enterprise SBDs showed up piecemeal like the others? Let’s not forget that they were without fighter cover.

What would have happened if Best didn’t veer off but went after Kaga instead? How would a 2 for 2 counterattack looked like for the US?

If we’re going to be objective, we can find plenty of faults with the way we fought. Let’s remember what we didn’t do right, and be thankful for the things that we did do right.

Part of the reason for why I love history so much is that while it may be incredible tales of valor to us, never forget that sometimes before – in this case, before we were even born – these were real men flying real planes fighting in a war that was very real.

I hope now you understand why I think Midway’s “Incredible Victory” is well deserved.