(Historical Inspirations) The Marshalls-Gilberts Raid

Today’s piece is actually an answer to a reader’s question from a few months ago, but I thought it’s probably better saved to answer in-depth.

What was the significance of the Gilbert Marshalls raid? I tried looking this up, but it seems that it didn’t do anything of value against the Japanese. No ships were sunk. No land was taken. Was it important if Wikipedia only had a very small section on it?

I’m glad you asked. In short, you are correct that the raid had little discernible effect on Japanese operations. However, its impact at home was far more profound. It was not only a significant morale booster for the general public, but the raid successfully demonstrated to Admiral King and Nimitz about what sort of missions we can carry out, and fed directly into the strategy we had in dealing with the Pacific campaign.

In other words, if the Pacific War is a chess game, then the Marshalls-Gilberts (or Marshall and Gilbert Islands raid) raid represents the movement of a pawn. By itself, the pawn did nothing. However, the game cannot progress without many such smaller moves.

Basically, let’s recap what’s happened in early 1942. US Asiatic Fleet is fleeing into the Java Sea. The Japanese took Hong Kong, is in the process is taking the whole Philippines, and are moving onto Singapore and Java. Already Japanese planes attack Ocean and Nauru, Japanese submarines shell Johnston, Midway, and Palmyra, and the British Gilberts (Kiribati) sees troop movements.

Here’s a map. Look at where all these islands are. In what direction does the Japanese seem to be going?

Here’s another map, but blown up slightly.

If you answer was “Hawaii,” you are not wrong, but that’s not the immediate goal (at least based on what American observers can tell). Notice how taking that chain of islands basically allows the Japanese to block any reinforcements from the North, and you’ll see what we’re getting at.

Yup. They’re aiming for Australia. Post-war analysis shows that we had correctly guessed that the Japanese planned (at least at this moment) an attack on American Samoa. Taking Samoa would give the Japanese a very good base of operations in which they can strike not only at Hawaii, but they can also cut off Australia from the war effort. It will also give Japanese planes and submarines an unprecedented ability to cut off any shipping or reinforcements to Australia.

So, what does Admiral King do? First order of business. Protect what territories we have on hand. Yorktown was sent to escort some 5,000 marines to Samoa to fortify the position. All available Pacific fleet units were more or less ordered on escort duty to protect shipping between Hawaii and the US main land.

Second order of business, and the more important one? Hit back. You don’t win wars by defending. King knew that. The order he gave to Nimitz was along the lines of “let me know what carriers you have that we can use for this task.”

Nimitz’s response? “I’ve got three carrier task forces. Leary’s Saratoga force, Brown’s Lexington force, and Halsey’s Enterprise force. Jack Fletcher with Yorktown is on the way escorting the marines.”

King’s thinking was twofold. The first is a long shot. If we attack somewhere on the islands, it might pull some Japanese fleet units out of the Java-Singapore rampage. Might even slow them down a bit. If not, well. If we can pull this one off successfully, it’ll be a good morale booster for people at home.

As you and I now know, King got the latter. The Japanese were too crafty to fall for the former.

The actual war planning was kind of interesting, though. We (particularly Admiral Pye) thought the Japanese might try to interdict the reinforcement, and the original plan was to send a second carrier down to support Yorktown just in case the Japanese launched a surprise attack. If no Japanese attack came, then Yorktown + one other carrier would take the lead to hit the Gilbert-Marshalls islands.

This leaves us with two carrier forces. Pye thinks we can send one off to distract the Japanese by hitting them at Wake. A second one can be kept in Pearl Harbor in case of any surprise attacks (again) or to reinforce as needed.

This plan sounds sensible, right? Well, many commanders were against it. The chief arguments made is that carrier-based attacks are likely impossible to succeed without the element of surprise. Critics, such as Claude Bloch (who was the previous Sink-us – er, Commander in Chief, US Fleet just two years ago), argued that the Japanese would be well prepared for such an attack, and given that they’ve successfully carried out Pearl Harbor, they’ve obviously prepared for any potential surprise attacks that could be carried out.

Bloch had a second argument that was more potent. They can’t risk the Pacific Fleet carriers. If Nimitz loses the carriers then Japan will overrun the entire Pacific. They were quite literally the last forces we had that could be mobile enough to answer any threats. His third argument was that Nimitz lacked the experience and the judgment to run the war. After all, Bloch just saw one junior admiral – Kimmel – raised to the position Nimitz holds now.

What happened? Pearl Harbor happened. A reminder that while we might think battleships are lol not useful, the loss of the entire battle force basically shocked us badly and put a very large dent on our warmaking capabilities.

I hope you can understand Bloch’s perspective. Here was another new guy, taking a pretty risky move. Why would this even be a good idea?

Nimitz, of course, had his reasons. Nimitz had studied the area extensively and talked to a lot of people. He had an eye for innovation and always had time to entertain new ideas. He correctly deduced that the Japanese likely had no significant naval assets in the area, and if they pulled this off right the Japanese would not be able to respond in any significant manner. This was, in short, a rare opportunity to score an opening hit.

Bloch wouldn’t budge. What’s more, most of the aviation officers agreed with Bloch for reasons as above. It took – quite literally – Halsey coming into the meeting and telling everyone to FUCK OFF (Halsey was well known for being a prolific user of profanity even in meetings like these) and STOP BEING UNAMERICAN WITH THAT DEFEATISM NONSENSE to finally push people into supporting the raid.

Five days later on the 11th, Nimitz sent Halsey out with Enterprise to Samoa.

Interestingly enough, the raid almost didn’t go through because Saratoga got torpedo’d on the same day. There was significant pressure for Nimitz to recall Enterprise now and defend Pearl Harbor, since the last time we heard about the Kidou Butai was that they left Japan on the 6th. So, it could be anywhere.

Nimitz, however, stuck to his original decision. You have to understand, command decisions aren’t easy. It never is. Originally he had planned to send Lexington out to attack Wake, but the only fleet oiler he had was sunk by a Japanese submarine on the 23rd, and so the Wake attack had to be cancelled.

At this point, you might be asking yourself, why is Nimitz being so risky? Wasn’t the original plan to have a diversionary attack on Wake so that the Marshall and Gilberts raids can go more smoothly?

Yes, but remember, Nimitz ended up being correct for a good reason. Thanks to SUBMARINE SCOUTING (emphasis mine, in all caps) Nimitz knew that the Marshall and Gilbert Islands were not only comparatively  lightly defended, but they were largely disorganized. What’s more, the submarine force found out that the Kidou Butai was at New Britain helping the army take Rabaul.

Halsey, then, was in the clear. He wasted no time in launching the actual attack. At the time of the raid, Halsey reported the following list of damages:

  1. Two submarines
  2. one small carrier
  3. one cruiser of some sort
  4. eight small ships
  5. many ships damaged
  6. many installations and fortifications damaged

All for the reasonable price of thirteen planes lost, one hit on Chester, and slight scratches on Enterprise.

We would later know that this wouldn’t be the case. Halsey’s actual score was one transport, two small ships, up to eight other ships damaged, and moderate damage to fortifications.

The press, however, was jubilant. I don’t think I can legally post copies of newspapers (you can search for them on various university archives if you have subscriptions), but look around Feb. 2-3 and you’ll find a lot of hilarious headlines. My favorite is probably PEARL HARBOR AVENGED (not quite, and won’t be for a long time), but it really shows the massive boost to morale the raid accomplished.

What’s more, successfully carrying this raid gave our commanders and troops valuable experience. From parsing intelligence to deducing opposing force intentions to actually carrying out the raid, we learned a lot from it. Most importantly our carriers obtained valuable operational experience, and as you’ll (hopefully) see in the future, this would to be the beginning of a series of battles that yes, eventually led to Midway.

Thanks for reading. Hope that was helpful.

PS. My primary sources here are largely from Nimitz’s collections that I’ve clipped as well as an autobiography of Halsey.

 

[Mail Call 10/7/2017] – Enterprise’s Carrier Corner

Oh hey. Everyone’s too busy for an update. Guess it’s time for another.

*Ahem*

ENTERPRISE’S CARRIER CORNER!

Not so fast Prisse. I’m not about to have someone else steal my SUB corner again. You’ve already did your SBD thing a while back.

But didn’t you say you were too busy today? I even prepared to talk a bit about Midway! The turning point of the war! Carriers were useful too! Easily the most important ship class of the war! I’m sure the readers-

Prisse… Tog’s had a long day…. You best not-

Carriers were the most important? Prisse… Lemme show you something real quick…

See that? DO YOU SEE THAT?

Yea. Carrier air has the most naval ships sunk! Woohoo! Victory through air power!

NO. LOOK HOW MANY SHIPS WERE SUNK BY SUBMARINES! LOOK AT IT.

1.6% of US Navy personnel were responsible for over HALF of enemy shipping sunk! HOW CAN YOU NOT SAY THEY WERE IMPORTANT!

…I wasn’t saying they weren’t important… I was just saying- 

THE US NAVY SUBMARINE FORCE DID TO JAPAN WHAT THE KRIEGSMARINE FAILED TO DO TO ENGLAND.

PLUS! THE US SUBMARINE FORCE SUFFERED THE HIGHEST MORTALITY RATE OF ALL BRANCHES OF THE US MILITARY!

GAAAAAAH! THE US SUBMARINE SERVICE NEVER GETS ANY LOVE OKAY!? EVERYONE EITHER COMPARES BATTLESHIP STATS. AS IF IT MATTERS? HOW MANY SHIPS WERE SANK BY BATTLESHIPS DURING WORLD WAR 2? THEN YOU’VE GOT THE PEOPLE THAT GOES AND MARVELS OVER THE STRIKING POWER OF CARRIER AIR. IF THERE ARE ANY PEOPLE WHO ARE INTERESTED IN SUBMARINES, THEY’RE ALWAYS DROOLING OVER THE U-BOATS.

WHAT’D THE U-BOATS DO?

LOSE THE WAR?

ANYTHING ELSE?

I’m sorry Tautog.

Nah. I’m sorry.

The US submarine service was plenty important. I didn’t want to imply otherwise. I won’t try to take your subcorners again.

I mean, I like your sub corners! I always learn something new! This is kinda your spot to tell the world the story of US submarines, so I guess it’s really rude for me to try and take it for myself. Sorry. I should have been more considerate.

Prisse. Uh. Sorry. I blew up. I put words in your mouth. Here. Next post can be a Carrier corner if you’d like.

Oh, no need. You go do your sub corners.

Really. I insist. Go write out a carrier corner. I’ll even help you!

YEA! WE’RE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RIGHT? WOOHOO! UNITED WE STAND! HOORAY FOR A HAPPY ENDING! I LOVE THIS COUNTRY!

DID I MISS SOMETHING? 

[Mail Call] 10/06/2017 Site slow-down

Sorry guys. Still can’t figure out what’s wrong with the site background. Worse, the site was super slow for me yesterday. We’ll probably be spending the weekend to look into it now.


What determines which shipgirl gets emojis?

Mostly random. I think I’ve answered this question before. Generally if the creative bug hits we’ll pick a particular shipgirl and have some sort of expression drawn.

When is Silent Service coming out?

Soon (TM)

Do you guys have any plans to come to _________

There’s about 4 or 5 different books I’m working on. Multiply that by two (and a half, since languages + translations). Then it’s typically busy season for us around October to the end of the year (in my real life business). Add the fact that we’re finally starting to release stuff thanks to printers coming online again, and you can see things get complicated.

The question’s better directed at Zero, if anything else.

Why have subgirls-related content taken over the site? What are the other girls doing?

Personal interest. Team interest. Also, I wouldn’t call it “taken over the site.” It’s more that the other characters are slowly getting worked into the setting of Silent Service, and that in other Pacific-related works plenty of characters show up. Basically the only characters that don’t get screen time are like, cruiser girls from vol 1 and 2, and even then, well. Chester’s a regular fixture in shenanigans (because she’s fun to write) and Phoenix our people just like.

Specifically, the reason is that we thought it would be good to draw people’s attention to a relatively neglected part of the war. KanColle and the assorted games haven’t really focused on submarines at all, and in all honesty, subs contributed a whole lot to us winning the war.

That, and the submarine is something of a unique beast among all naval ship “types.” It’s still relevant to today, but the submarine itself went through some rather remarkable transformations. K9 already mentioned it in one of the sub-corners earlier.

Besides, from our perspective, we’re keeping it as a hobby project. You can see that Silent Service gets “article”-sized updates basically every week, and there’s a healthy smattering of content already. As the book comes to completion we’ll probably still update Silent Service, but well, let’s just see if I can get it done first. x)

[Mail Call] 10/04/2017 Site-stuff & more history edition

Hi all,

Phoenix still have the website to herself at the moment. Zero’s looking into it now, but we’re as puzzled as you are. We’re neither sure of how the bug got there, nor are we entirely positive on how it should be removed.

All books are still going according to plan. So that’s that.

And now, for some lore-related matters…


In regards to the beginnings of Pacific history… Were the other nations all contacted together at once or on a separate basis?
Which countries were given this information, and why? To whom was this information given to?
On a separate basis. Truman immediately arranged for contact with the Prime Minister of Britain (yes, it’s still Churchill in Pacific’s timeline) to speak privately on the matter. Contact to the USSR occurred sometimes after.
In the 1950s knowledge of the Abyssals were limited strictly to the heads of state of the non-US countries. It is unclear whether or not Stalin disclosed this information to a handful of trusted generals and advisors, but STEC’s own opinion is that if any of the “old guard” knew about it, they certainly kept it a secret. Soviet counter-Abyssal operations did not take off until Petr appeared, at any rate.
Truman’s decision was pretty simple. After conversing with Iowa, he had reached the conclusion that the “shipgirls” are likely to originate from countries with strong naval traditions. Britain was the logical choice – it’s a US ally and have the most to lose from an Abyssal invasion. At the time, Truman did not think to ask if Iowa had recalled meeting any non-Allied shipgirls. While no harm was caused in the context of this erroneous assumption (though, hilariously enough, the Japanese were in for a nasty shock when they realized that Japan wasn’t the only country with shipgirls sometimes later in the 60s) the US seriously pondered the possibility of well, applying shipgirls to contemporary politics. The temptation of having Iowa go public and shock the Soviets was very strong, after all.
It was for this reason that Stalin was not informed until around the end of the Truman presidency. The first was that Truman had to balance the benefits to the US to the world at large. The second was that the Korean War was in full-swing, and Stalin – while curious about this particular matter – did not seem at all interested in communicating with the US directly. Given that the USSR does not have a strong naval tradition (and again, Iowa did not recall meeting any Soviet shipgirls, but she remembers plenty of American and at least a few British and other Allied ones), Truman didn’t really push, either.
(I should note, from a creator’s purpose, that choosing for Pacific’s timeline to begin during the Truman presidency is very, very intentional. Specifically, many shipgirl works or shipgirl type works like to take their tales towards the route of high fantasy-super hero fiction. Shipgirls – if they are in possession of innate powers or even very high tech equipment – tend to play the role of something like the Justice League. They become the drivers of world politics and the entire world’s spotlight is on them. Through that, I often see the creation of some remarkably idealized societies, where the existence of shipgirls seem to solve a lot of problems as if by magic. The alternative, and you see this quite a bit as well, is that shipgirls become something like a type of doomsday weapon. Politics are decided by shipgirls. World events are influenced by shipgirls to a gigantic degree. In some works I’ve even seen shipgirls “dueling” each other, and resolving thousand-year long ethnic or national conflicts with a simple trial by combat.
I am not particularly interested in that particular type of world-building. To me, the interesting thing is thinking about how historical figures may have responded to changes (thanks to the Abyssals), and my shipgirls and other characters only play a role in it. I also feel like simply using shipgirls to solve all international disputes or national problems is … too simple of a solution. It undervalues the extremely difficult questions leaders have to ask themselves, and reduce any potential complexity down to a JRPG-esque “who has more power” or “who has a higher power level.”
So, towards that end, Pacific’s atmosphere is strictly one where shipgirls are behind the scenes. Spy-flick. X-COM. Intrigue. I’ve heard all of these terms used to describe Pacific, and they aren’t wrong. However, in order to achieve something like this, I need to create a credible precedent. After all, much like the above situation, the readers (and I) are likely to ask ourselves: why set the story in this way?
Enter Truman.
From Truman’s perspective, the atomic bomb played an integral role in the development of his worldview. The newfound power of matters nuclear really, really gave him a perspective on leadership that no other US president to date has had to face. Quote below, from a State of the Union.

We have no reason to think that the stage we have now reached in the release of atomic energy will be the last. Indeed, the speed of our scientific and technical progress over the last seven years shows no signs of abating. We are being hurried forward, in our mastery of the atom, from one discovery to another, toward yet unforeseeable peaks of destructive power.

Inevitably, until we can reach international agreement, this is the path we must follow. And we must realize that no advance we make is unattainable by others, that no advantage in this race can be more than temporary.

The war of the future would be one in which man could extinguish millions of lives at one blow, demolish the great cities of the world, wipe out the cultural achievements of the past–and destroy the very structure of a civilization that has been slowly and painfully built up through hundreds of generations.

Such a war is not a possible policy for rational men. We know this, but we dare not assume that others would not yield to the temptation science is now placing in their hands.

To Truman, the Abyssal threat represents something very similar to the powers unleashed by the atomic bomb. He is acutely aware that he is a man of an era past, and he is living to see the end of his era – the era of himself and Lenin (in the same speech he comments to Stalin that Lenin wrote before the nuclear bomb) – and the beginning of a new one.

The solution to new problems and new threats that arise will not be through technology or superior force of arms. Rather, as Truman stated…

Our ultimate strength lies, not alone in arms, but in the sense of moral values and moral truths that give meaning and vitality to the purposes of free people. These values are our faith, our inspiration, the source of our strength and our indomitable determination.

We face hard tasks, great dangers. But we are Americans and we have faced hardships and uncertainty before, we have adjusted before to changing circumstances. Our whole history has been a steady training for the work it is now ours to do.

No one can lose heart for the task, none can lose faith in our free ways, who stops to remember where we began, what we have sought, and what accomplished, all together as Americans.

I have lived a long time and seen much happen in our country. And I know out of my own experience, that we can do what must be done.

When I think back to the country I grew up in–and then look at what our country has become–I am quite certain that having done so much, we can do more.

Much like how a nuclear bomb will not and cannot solve all of America’s problems, Truman believes that shipgirls cannot be the one-stop solution to America’s problems either. If America is to survive, then, we must come together.