Shipgirl equipment

What’s that strange-looking thing that Cusk is holding in her hand?

Oh. It’s how she controls those Loon missiles. Design below.

This is something of a mash-up between actual controllers and of course, shipgirl equipment.

Fortunately, due to Cusk’s personality, most of the bells and whistles are literally just that – bells and whistles. How this thing actually works is pretty ridiculously simple.

Cusk programs in a location.

The “thingie” (as Dolphin calls it) calculates a trajectory and a path and adjusts the fairy-variant Loon automatically (so Cusk doesn’t have to physically touch the thing to adjust it – think of it like a remote control). Asks Cusk for permission to launch.

Cusk launches the missile with a click.

The missile guides itself towards the target.

In other words, this particular shipgirl weapon (the Loon, not the radar-gun – though knowing Cusk it’s probably an actual raygun ala pulp novels by the time she’s actually done with it) is extraordinarily more powerful compared to the real thing. It’s a ‘fairy’ weapon, after all, and its accuracy is more similar to the missiles we use today than the actual V-1 of yesterday.

You might ask then, well, is it really a V-1 then?

That’s a bit of a philosophical question, right? If a shipgirl is capable of telling her airgroups and relay information to them in real-time, which WW2 planes obviously could not accomplish with the same degree of ability, isn’t that the same question?

The answer to that is that it is both yes and no. Yes, because the shape, the internal construction, and the “identity” of each weapon is clearly identifiable as a World War II counterpart. No, because, well, for one thing, WW2 weapons don’t have literal super-powered tiny dudes running around and operating it.

(At least, not to my knowledge, anyways. 😉

Or, to put it another way. Take an anime like, say, Girls Und Panzer. The tanks in there are basically operating off of anime physics. No way a normal Hetzer can stand the weight of a Maus, but it did.And I doubt you could do the sort of flip-attack in the movie either. But they’re still clearly identifiable as their real-life counterparts.

Silent Service: Early War Reconnaissance

Why even give publicity to trolls and armchair generals? That should have gone into the recycle bin, not a website article.
It’s just encouraging retards to email in the dumb shit. Stop trying to justify Pacific’s universe, and instead tell those goons to fuck off and create their own fanwork which conforms to their ideas.

I totally agree! See, questions like these are much better.

In one of Tautog’s silent corners you mentioned that U.S. Submarines were frequently used for scouting purposes as an actual part of their mission. How did this work? How would a submarine even take this kind of information in the first place?

I’m glad you asked. Let me refer you to a manual I have on hand. While the U.S. Navy was still figuring things out in 1942, you can get an idea of how reconnaissance worked by looking at a manual called “Current Submarine Doctrine.”

(Yeah, creative, I know. This is the Navy, after all!)

According to that manual, which was distributed to all submarine commanders…

Submarines are capable of performing three types of reconnaissance missions.

a). Visual reconnaissance through periscope,

b). Photographic reconnaissance through periscope,

c). Reconnaissance by landing party.

I think this list is pretty self-explanatory, but to elaborate slightly…

At the time, many Japanese fortifications were completely unknown. Some of our intelligence on say, the Carolines or the Marianas have been outdated for at least twenty or so years. So, naturally, it was the submarine’s job to figure out what they had. Shore guns. Harbor defenses. Military installations. Beachheads for amphibious attacks. That sort of thing.

(I also think this answers both of your questions. Submarines literally took pictures, or put guys on shore to take pictures. The commander then wrote down any additional notes that he might have thought would be important, and then ran away to safety.)

Now, you might be thinking. Why not just use air recon? Well, aerial reconnaissance has two problems. First, when you fly a plane over, the enemy know you’re scouting them. Secondly, an airplane is only in the area for limited amounts of time, and you can’t really check the accuracy or the orientation of your charts.

The submarine might be slower, but it can do both.

Now, about the cameras used? Those were jury-rigged. Navy has it on record that the Pompano was the first to run one of these reconnaissance missions, and it just so happens that Cmdr. Parks was an expert photographer. After figuring out just how to find a proper focal point, he managed to rig up a small camera on the scope. Two other boats – the Dolphin and the Tautog – followed.

In those super early days, everyone was still learning. The Pompano herself almost got sunk by none other than the U.S. Navy. While she was swimming along, a PBY patrol bomber saw her, thought she was Japanese, and came over to bomb her at 7 AM in the morning. The Pompano’s crew was rightfully confused, and noted in their report that this must have been from a different squadron than the Oahu-based ones since those weren’t scheduled to take off in this sector until much later.

Then this gem happened.

What happened was that the PBY pilots freaked out and called in help. Hours later, three SBDs flew over from the Enterprise and bombed her again. Lucky for the Pompano (and unlucky for the Enterprise pilots, or maybeI should say, lucky for them, too) she only suffered some mild damage in the form of a leaky tank.

Anyways, despite this, Pompano successfully completed her mission. Now, bear in mind that the quality of the photos might not be very high – they looked probably closer to something like below.

Nonetheless, it was good enough to get the important stuff, and submarines will continue to provide a lot of useful intelligence down the road. Years later, submarine reconnaissance would prove to be vital in places such as Tarawa, where the Nautilus would take pictures that would result in correcting a gigantic compass error from the British charts that we were using at the time.

As for the landing party stuff? I think you’ll wanna hear about some of the actual missions. They’re pretty thrilling. So I’m going to hold off here for now! Thanks for dropping by.

[Mail Call] 2017/07/24 – Ideology

Settle down, guys. This one’s going to be a heavy read. Also I have a sore throat, and I feel sick, and I PROBABLY shouldn’t be writing at like 4 in the morning but I can’t sleep.

Reminds me of last year when we first showed Lori – people were put off by a “Nazi submarine” despite the fact that she did like, nothing under the Nazis. I saved a bunch of questions of this type for a rainy day because folks have been asking me just what exactly is the implication for having von Braun pop up as a fairy.

… It’s exactly what it is. I want people to read up and look up von Braun and reach their own conclusions, and of course I’ll be commenting myself about how I feel about his contributions during the war. Wait for the actual art piece to show up, and then we’ll talk more about this.

For the record? Something’s off with von Braun. His appearance lends great credence to one faction of STEC fairy researchers (the fairies are impressions or shadows of historical figures camp), which points out that this fairy is literally incapable of doing anything else other than craft plans that can then be fed into the fairy machines. He appears to be incapable of comprehending anything outside of that, and retains neither von Braun’s womanizing tendencies nor anything of a personality.

In fact, STEC’s not sure if he’s an “ace fairy” or just a slightly more powerful/evolved engineering fairy. Certainly he is nowhere as animated as some of the other named figures.


Pacific’s out to make a realistic world. This necessitates a diversity of opinions and viewpoints. On one hand it means that the USSR is alive and well and provides an ideological counterpoint to the West. On the other hand, it very much means that less righteous ideologies are alive. Nazism, for example, is alive and well and growing in West Germany. Decades of being in functional occupation’ll do that.

Having actual Nazi shipgirls – as in, if we are to consider the full extent of which Pacific “builds” each shipgirl – is only going to add fuel to the fire. There’s a reason why German shipgirls aren’t exactly in the foreground.

For the record, they range from the ideologically deviant (such as Lori who turned her back on that ideology) to the, well, ideologically coherent (Pacific’s Bismarck is probably a good example of this). I’m not in the business to do apologetics for the other side, so there’s little reason for me to bring them into the plot unless I have a reason to do so.

(This is surprisingly similar to Japan, which in-lore is actually splintered. It’s an apt analogy of Japanese politics and ideologies today.)

It’s not like they’re easy to write, either. You know I don’t do anything half-assed and I don’t straw-man. The struggle here is literally how to create a realistic “German” shipgirl given the themes of Pacific without veering into full-on “WAR OF POLISH AGGRESSION” territory, since that WOULD be a valid perspective coming from well, Germany.

In other words, I think it is absolutely dangerous to try to write German shipgirls or Japanese shipgirls and pretend that they’re all apologetic about what had happened. They’re not. Some are. Many aren’t. To suggest that they do would be willingly ignoring real life and real history, and you really do miss an opportunity to educate and show our perspective. In fact, there’s a reason why this is still an issue today in East Asia – just last month Shinzo Abe declared that Japan didn’t invade anything and corrected a reporter twice regarding Japan’s role in WW2.

That’s the prime minister of Japan, in case you haven’t figure it out. In 2017.

“So then why bother? Why have wrongthink?”

Because the American thing to do here is to give my readers freedom. I set out to create a realistic, diverse world. I am not going to clamp down on my reader’s freedom of choice. What I am going to do, however, is to show you why our way of life – our values – are better.

Why we’re more right, so to speak.

Because, as an American, as arrogant as this is, that is our national character. Once you truly understand the sort of things we stand for, you can’t turn your back on it. You know how in Christianity there is a common line of thinking that “once saved, you’re always saved?”

I think “American values,” if you want me to comment on an abstract fashion, is something like it. Once you understand what it means to be free, for instance, you don’t want to take that away from anyone, and you’ll fight like hell to keep things that way.

This is what makes the American shipgirls in Pacific American. In fact, I would argue that this is what makes Pacific Pacific. As this is an American-centric work written by a bunch of Americans and drawn by people who are fans of America, it only makes sense that at its core, America is coherent and consistent. Pennsy and Sanny can fight over politics all they want, but at the end of the day? They’re both going to be red, white, and blue.

This should be no surprise to anyone. Every writer, creator, whatever you want to call it, will have their own viewpoints that they want to superimpose onto their readers. It is absolutely impossible to have a piece of writing that conveys no inherent meaning. You’re either trying to convince someone of something or you’re trying to convince someone that they’re wrong about something. Even a simple statement like “the sky is blue” is affirming an observation about the nature or the color of the sky.