[Mail Call] 2017/08/19 – Propaganda War & Switching Sides

HI! I’m relatively new here so sorry in advance if my question has already been answered! Is there such a thing as shipgirls/abyssals that have gone rogue or switched sides, and if so would the pacific team ever cover them?

Or something like this.

Wouldn’t it be kool if you have DARK shipgirls?

Or something like this.

How good is STEC’s propaganda department? Because here’s what I’m thinking. If they’re good enough to keep the conspiracy theorists chasing their tails then they have to be really good at disseminating information, right?

Any chance you can get the Abyssals to turn? To fight each other I mean?

First of all, on that last point, it’s kind of an inside joke that STEC keeps an eye out for recruitment on the (primitive) internet discussion groups. Pacific is 1990s tech with some elements of modern and even post-modern lifestyles thrown in. The shipgirls are generally exceptionally good at suppressing the Abyssals before they get anywhere close to shore-based facilities, but you’ll always have the one or two oddballs claiming that something’s not quite right. STEC itself may or not be actively feeding those conspiracy theories.

Secondly, the answer to this is no. Let me explain why.

Generally, propaganda takes form in several elements. From our own Army War College’s manuals on psychological warfare, propaganda focuses on the following elements:

  • Divisive propaganda are propaganda pieces designed to sow discord within the command structure of an opposing force. Interservice rivalry is a big one and it was historically used to great effect both in Europe and in the Pacific. Pointing out that the officers didn’t care for their men and ate well while they starved caused no small amount of consternation in the Guadalcanal campaign.
  • Subversive propaganda are propaganda pieces that are designed to undermine one’s basic fundamentals or the core values in which one is fighting for. Historically, works in this category tend to ask more nuanced philosophical questions. Questioning the noblesse of the Great East Asia War was one example. Allowing Japanese soldiers to know of their own atrocities. as well as the increasingly poor conditions in which the wartime government placed on their family members, was another. What worked the best, though, was asking whether or not this was really what the Emperor had wanted.
  • Enlightenment propaganda are propaganda pieces that are designed to educate – that is to say, to shake the enemy’s resolve through the introduction of new information. Historically, for instance, we introduced a large number of pamphlets in the Pacific theater showing the Japanese that we were human rather than monsters. We also offered them a perspective of our own viewpoints – showing ’em just what exactly is the whole “mom and apple pie” thing that we’re fighting over. Years later, we were on the receiving end with this in the Korean War – I’ve got some interesting scans from back home about pamphlets that the Communist forces were dropping on our lines.
  • Despair propaganda are propaganda pieces in which we’re likely familiar with – the idea is to induce despair or negative feelings in those fighting, either through demonstrating the superiority of the opponent or the disclosure of losses.

Okay, now look at this list.

Then remember that the first thing humanity got hit with was quite literally a heavy dose of psychological warfare. Remember what happened to the US naval taskforce off the coast of Korea? In the end the human mind broke before the ship did. The Abyssals are masters of manipulation and will use every card they have in the deck to destroy humanity. To not defend against this would be folly.

The thing is, which one of these would actually work on a shipgirl?

How does an Abyssal “enlighten” a shipgirl on the “wrongness” of humanity? “We aren’t horrible space monsters we just want to create everlasting peace by wiping away every last atom of human civilization?” “We’re just defending the environment by eating all of you?” “Humans are bad and therefore they should be killed?”

I mean, the core tenet here is that the Abyssals want to erase your existence from the planet. They then tend to actually strip the planet itself bare, leaving it a barren rock. It’s not that we (STEC’s POV) don’t know that this is what they do. The Heart of Avalon has spat out enough documentation from other worlds for us to know that this is a fact.

Humanity may be dumb, vulgar, capricious, malicious, and in some cases downright suicidal or insane, but do you honestly see any shipgirl fall to this trap? Think about what would even cause the shipgirl to show up in the first place!

Piece together what you’ve learned so far. How is it that some shipgirls have vivid memories of historical events, or even some other Abyssal war?

How would they know what they know?

Given that they know what they know (sorry for being wordy), why would any subversive propaganda work in the first place? The shipgirls are fighting a purely defensive war. The Abyssals are full-on aggressors. They aren’t conquerors because they don’t want to rule over humanity. They aren’t liberators because they don’t seek to impose an ideal over humanity. They are simple aggressors and destroyers. Their goal is to destroy humanity.

An Abyssal has never offered anything like a ceasefire or a treaty to any aspect of humanity, shipgirl or otherwise. Even intelligent humanoid Abyssals with “identities” such as “ARTOIS” or “LAUFEY” does not seem to have a full capacity for reasoning or thought. They don’t understand humanity, makes no effort to understand humanity, and have zero sympathy for humanity. How could they create anything close to effective subversion without the above?

… Let me veer off into another territory. Suppose you have an Abyssal intelligence who manages to understand humanity. They understand the full-on implication behind their war of interdimensional extermination.

What happens when that Abyssal asks, why? Why do we hate humans?

What happens if the Abyssal decides that “because we do” is an insufficiently deep answer – even if it is working to further the goals of the Abyssal fleet? What if it wants to learn more?

Don’t you think it’s in the best interest of the overarching Abyssal intelligence to make sure that none of their agents ever develop this sort of autonomy? Wouldn’t it make sense for them to nip any intelligent learning as such in the bud?

Now you see why the Abyssals cannot really engage in subversion. At most they may be able to convince the humans to do it for them. Any Abyssal that is sent to understand how humanity function will learn nothing or learn too much. There is no middle ground.

Okay, how about sowing division? Get the shipgirls to fight each other. Get them to hate their officers. Problem solved.

Plenty of issues here.

Due to the nature of STEC’s organization, STEC is never going to be anything large enough that the commanding officer couldn’t just have a sit-down with everyone. In fact, that’s part of Mike’s job. He is response for the spirit of the shipgirls as a whole. He’s also quite literally manning the hub – the mothership, so to speak – of STEC’s fighting force. If humanity is to lose this war he’s probably actually going to be one of the first to die, because there’s no way the Abyssals would pass up something like Avalon base.

(In fact, I’d say taking out Avalon base would be priority number 1. It’ll decapitate STEC’s intelligence network, prevent global deployment, and create enormous technological and material setbacks all at the same time)

Secondly, shipgirls are GIRLS. Women are naturally more empathetic and they communicate a lot more often with each other than men (on average). Also, something you guys might not know, but gossip travels faster than the speed of light. We have something of a herd mentality there where if anyone is feeling down others’ll pop over and help things out. To sow division and cause infighting you’re going to have to simultaneously take out and completely shake, oh, I dunno, maybe 2/3rds of the shipgirls currently introduced out of our cast of close to 100 characters. Then you still have to actually remove the peacemakers like Langley and Mary.

Good luck convincing Iowa or Jer that STEC doesn’t care for their well-being when they both know first-hand what an uncaring bureaucracy actually looks like.

Good luck convincing Pennsy or Sanny that America’s not worth fighting for.

Or the Yorktown trio that sacrifice is meaningless. Or a certain swashbuckling CV girl that rules and regulations are bad.

Thirdly, STEC is self-sufficient as an organization when it comes to fighting the Abyssals. It’s ran by fairies, remember? You can’t deny STEC resources or claim that the _____ is sabotaging their efforts like the IJA/IJN. That’s kind of why STEC was built-up to begin with. Denying political support? Yeah, good luck accomplishing that when the opposing force just wants to nom ya. “Let’s pressure the president to remove ____ because -”

Because what?

Nevermind the fact that Truman and Eisenhower’s direction to STEC accounts for the possibility of the entirety of civilian command being crippled by an alpha-strike on the Abyssal Fleet’s part. I’ve mentioned again and again that STEC is independent. For it to be independent it means it possess quite a bit of power to act on its own initiative. You didn’t think they might take potential Abyssal interference into account when creating this organization?

So, okay. Despair propaganda. This might work. After all, the Abyssals are technologically far ahead of humanity, their numbers seem limitless, they appear to be inscrutable, and they seem impossible to defeat.

Again, see previous point, point 2. You need to somehow demoralize the entire organization in order to start sowing despair in the rank. That’s the first thing.

Second thing. These are shipgirls.

Stripped of all weapons and equipment, kill all their fairies. What do you have? You still have a fairly powerful individual possessing toughness and durability far beyond that of anything the planet’s ever seen and an innate ability to carve through Abyssal defenses like a knife through butter. They aren’t exactly limited in the same way as ordinary humans are.

That, and like I said, being a shipgirl is a completely voluntary thing. Before they appear, shipgirls know what they’re getting themselves into. They very well may fail in their objective – preventing the Abyssals from destroying humanity – before the Abyssals can get them to give up.

So, there you have it. Hope that answers the question clearly enough. I’ll conclude with one final note.

Generally propaganda is used to decrease the effort in which it’d take to win the war. This is because in real life, wars are constrained by many things such as material and manpower. If you need 1000 casualties to take a hill and you can print some propaganda leaflefts to scare the enemy off, that’s 1000 casualties you don’t have to take.

The issue here is the Abyssal approach to “war” is very different from ours. Its objective is destruction. Having something that’s not directly contributing to that goal is something that’s pretty horrendously alien to it. It’d be a silly idea to get the opponent to switch to our side if I’m still going to kill her at the end of the day.

“Well, it’ll make destroying humans that much easier!”

Yes. But why should I waste the effort on something that may or not work when I can warp in stronger Abyssals to accomplish the exact same thing?

Furthermore, the Abyssal fleet have no tolerance for traitors. A unit not performing up to par will be immediately eradicated. If a shipgirl “unit” (because that’s how they’ll see the shipgirls are) turns against its “side” then it must also be defective. Again, why would the Abyssal fleet use a defective unit when it can use a functional one?

PS. If after reading all this you STILL have ideas about how to subvert the shipgirls, please send me – I mean, the Abyssal fleet, a message. Thanks! We look forward to receiving your ideas.

Lens of History (11)

STEC Archives, Print Document Division
Curator signature: Trout
Format: Archival Records
Object: Archival Records, 89th Congress & Commentary
Location (if known): Washington DC
Time (if known): August 25, 1965

H.R. 2580 (Hart-Celler Act)

August 25, 1965

August 25, 1965 – Received in the Senate, read twice.

August 25, 1965 – Senate proceeded with eighty minutes of debate on H.R. 2580

August 25, 1965 – Considered under suspension of the rules.

August 25, 1965 – Failed to pass Senate by Yea-Navy Vote. 43-57.

[Lore] Timeline changes: the USA

I’ve been mulling over the timeline and something doesn’t quite measure up. Care to clarify for me how this came about?

As you mention repeatedly, most countries appear to be “doing better” comparatively to where they are in real life. The Soviet Union is, in your own words, hale and hearty and provides an ideological balance to the West. My personal distaste for communism aside, how did this come about?

In real life, as you are aware, a wave of communist uprisings occurred in the 1950s and 1960s. Additionally, even if the Soviet Union did not care for intervention, the United States certainly did. I name, in historical chronological order, the US interfered in places such as the Korean peninsula, Syria, Iran, Guatemala, Tibet, Indonesia, Lebanon, Cuba, various parts of Africa, Guyana, so and so forth, eventually resulting in Vietnam in the 1970s.

Let us assume for a moment that the Soviet Union is as “good” as they claim to be. Given significant support of the US to the above operations historically, how do you plan on explaining the lack of popular and political support for such interventions in Pacific’s setting?

Good question. As usual, I love it when a question is thoughtful and detailed. It’s also a chance for me to step back from planning and writing and well, flex some muscles once in a while.

The shorter version is that diplomacy and the Korean War.

The short version of this is that from a thematic perspective, it is necessary for Pacific to build a less interventionist America in order to make the entire world work. To create a world with multiple competing great powers, it necessitates “nerfs” to certain historical actions that would have cemented America’s status as a superpower in the world. This basically means that UK and Japan need to be powerful, even major local powers with (some) ability to influence global politics.

Using East Asia as an example. Japan’s strategic independence happened around the 80s, more or less, but it’s currently hemmed in by a very hostile USSR (some of the Lens of History’s already hinted at this – you’ll see) and a growing China, which is (strangely enough) playing something of a role similar to a very aggressively developing yet very non-interventionist Switzerland. It’s not firmly aligned with the USSR despite both countries being communist, and it’s not really courting the US either. In short, it’s just kind of there… doing its own thing.

What caused this to happen are basically two significant events. The loss of the US Pacific fleet – as noted in AR, and the Korean War, where Pacific’s timeline formally diverges from our real life one today. What happened was that the Chinese took and inflicted far more casualties than they did historically, and the USSR was on the verge of direct military intervention. Stalin was also more than happy to freely unload the excessive military build-up onto China, and Soviet Lend-lease, for what it’s worth, made it extremely costly for the UN (but let’s be honest, it’s mostly the US) forces.

Just how bloody? I’ll give you a hint. It’s easily in the six digit casualty (death, not wounded) range. At a minimum that’s 2.5x more (give or take) than the historical Korean War. As you can imagine this war did not sit well with people at home. The US military was a bit like a man half-drunk at the time. It had been disarmed and then hastily rearmed. Most of its veterans have left service, returning to civilian life. Morale is understandably low (The South Koreans didn’t help. They engaged in scorched earth tactics just like the North Koreans did and news coverage of Syngman Rhee really didn’t help things along) both at home and abroad. By 1951, in Pacific’s timeline, support for the war have dipped below 50%. When Soviet lend-lease kicked in and the coffins seriously started to come home at an alarming rate, support dropped even further. Eisenhower’s refusal to declare war on the USSR really didn’t sit well with the anti-communist Republicans (and Democrats), while those concerned for their own re-election in an unpopular war wanted out. It was just a mess.

For the record, Europe is on the verge of unrest. When the Suez canal incident (also ahistorical in Pacific) occurred in 1954, the Korean War is still going on. Faced with the French collapse in Indochina, social upheaval in the Philippines and Southeast Asia, regime change in the Middle East, and political intrigue in Europe. Add the threat of that Abyssal invasion on top of it, and you can probably see just how Eisenhower, at least, finally lost patience trying to play World Police.

With the Korean War finally ending in 1956, the CIA in Pacific’s timeline was not given nearly as much independence or support as it did in real life. Other presidents didn’t really seem to be interested in expanding the scope of its activities either. STEC is also something of a chip that each administration can in theory wield directly – power of the executive branch, indeed. That reduces incentive to fund the CIA as well.

Note that despite STEC not being used politically, it basically allowed for significant off-the-record interactions diplomatically between the US and the USSR (and other countries). While Stalin himself (at least to STEC’s current knowledge) has never disclosed whether or not he’s taking the Abyssal threat seriously, there are many senior members in the USSR that do, chief among them General Secretary and eventually Premier Khrushchev, Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko, and Marshalls Rokossovsky and Zhukov.

This tradition of diplomacy basically gave those involved in STEC, at least, huge amounts of bargaining power politically, since they know – without others knowing that they know – generally what the actual opinions are coming from the other powers.

Hope that answers the question somewhat. I got home super late today. x)

[Mail Call] 2017/07/28 – Pacific Force Balance

Just noticed something that I kind of want to point out.

Pacific is really heavy on anything but actual light vessel ship girls. There are far more battleship ship girls than destroyer ship girls.

So how does it work out then? What are the downsides to a battleship ship girl that you would not want to have them do everything? Why do destroyer ship girls even exist if they have bigger guns?

I think this question is more like, “why do we even have tank destroyers if we have tanks already.”

Lots of reasons. I mentioned rate of fire in another one. Speed is yet another. Supplies and logistics a third. Fairies a fourth. The ability for DD girls to carry a larger assortment of utility equipment a fifth. “Stealth” a sixth (DD girls are harder for the Abyssals to detect).

Furthermore, each shipgirl is unique. They all bring something unique to the table. Even Raleigh. There is essentially some skill that each shipgirl is (more or less) uniquely good at that no other girl can do just as well. Some of these might not be combat-based. Some are.

DD girls hold the largest range of “powers,” ranging from superior reflexes and “bullet-time” speed (Maury) to seafaring brick (Tasha, though to be honest a couple of other DD girls share this trait) to improvisational combat (O’bannon) to magical healing touch (Shaw) to visual calculation & assessment (Mahan) to auto-fairy-air-cover call-in (Edsall) to eidetic recall + projection (DD girl, vol. 3) to mesmerism/enhanced charisma (DD girl, vol. 3) and so on and so forth.

In fact, the one DD girl who doesn’t seem to have a unique niche so far (also in vol. 3) seems to be an oddity. Maybe she really isn’t anyone too exceptional. After all, her historical counterpart does have a nickname of “the destroyerest destroyer,” having done pretty much literally everything a destroyer could ever think to do.

Or maybe she’s got something else, too. You’ll just have to watch and see.